Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy
Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy

History often reminds us that the seas connecting Asia were never barriers; they were bridges. Centuries before modern diplomacy, long before Jakarta and Ankara ever exchanged embassies, the Javanese courts and the Ottoman Empire shared ties rooted in faith, power and a shared struggle against European colonial expansion. The history of Java’s connection to the Ottoman Empire, often overshadowed by the better-known Aceh-Ottoman alliance, is a story that reveals how global the Islamic world once was, and how deep Indonesia’s links to the wider Muslim world truly ran.
The relationship between Java and the Ottoman Empire goes beyond trade or military cooperation. It was also a matter of legitimacy and identity. According to accounts preserved in Javanese royal chronicles and historical studies, the sultan of the Ottoman Empire once recognized Raden Patah of the Demak Sultanate – the first Islamic kingdom in Java – as Khalifatullah ing Tanah Jawa, or “God’s Caliph in the Land of Java.” This symbolic recognition, accompanied by ceremonial gifts such as banners made from the Kiswah (the cloth covering the Kaaba), represented not just political approval but spiritual connection. It placed the emerging Javanese Muslim sultanates within the broader framework of the Islamic world, where the Ottoman caliph stood as the supreme leader.
This early contact, though largely ceremonial, reflected the expanding influence of the Ottoman caliphate across the Indian Ocean. The 16th century saw Muslim powers in the Malay world, particularly Aceh, seeking Ottoman assistance against the Portuguese. While the Acehnese were the first to send formal envoys to Istanbul in the 1530s, Java’s Muslim rulers were equally conscious of the growing need to align themselves with the powerful Daulah Utsmaniyah. The Mataram ruler Sultan Agung (1613-1645), for instance, reportedly sent envoys to the Ottoman court through Aceh, seeking religious and political recognition. The return of his delegation marked a new chapter of symbolic allegiance, with Ottoman banners, ceremonial turbans and even jars of zam-zam water enshrined in Javanese palaces as sacred heirlooms.
These gestures of connection carried more than aesthetic meaning. They showed how deeply the Ottoman Empire inspired the imagination of Javanese kings. Ottoman military organization, political hierarchy and religious symbolism would later echo in Javanese resistance movements. Prince Diponegoro’s army during the Java War (1825-1830), for example, adopted Ottoman-style ranks such as Ali Basah (from Ali Pasha) and named one of its brigades “Turkiyo.” For Diponegoro and his contemporaries, invoking the Ottoman name was not merely imitation; it was an act of solidarity, a way of embedding the Javanese struggle against the Dutch within a global Islamic resistance narrative.
The Ottoman image in Java was not limited to politics or war. It seeped into literature, myth and religious imagination. Javanese manuscripts such as Serat Paramayoga and Serat Jayabaya Musarar depict figures from “Rum” – the local term for the Ottoman Turks – as civilizing messengers who brought Islam and enlightenment to Java. These texts reframe the island’s history, replacing older Indian-centric narratives with new ones that place Java within a Muslim cosmology linked to Mecca, Istanbul and beyond.
The poet Raden Ngabehi Ranggawarsita even described the Ottoman sultan as “Sultan Algabah,” a guardian who sent Aji Saka, a legendary cultural hero, to develop the island. Such literary imagination was not mere mythmaking; it reflected how deeply the Ottoman caliphate had captured the moral and spiritual imagination of the Javanese elite.
A letter from William Farquhar to Sultan Muhammad Kanzul Alam of Brunei, dated Nov. 28, 1819, appears on the left, while on the right is a letter from the Ottoman sultan in Istanbul to the sultan of Aceh from the 1500s. Despite the distance in time and geography, both documents reveal a striking resemblance in form and style – a reflection of the shared artistic traditions of Ottoman calligraphy and Javanese Pegon script.
By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the resonance of Ottoman leadership had not faded. When the caliphate faced Western encroachment and internal decline, Muslims in the Dutch East Indies rallied emotionally and politically. Organizations like Syarikat Islam raised the Ottoman flag during their 1916 congress in Bandung as a symbol of solidarity and anti-colonial defiance. When Mustafa Kemal abolished the caliphate in 1924, the shock was felt across Java. Indonesian Muslim leaders from Muhammadiyah’s K.H. Ahmad Dahlan to Nahdlatul Ulama’s K.H. Wahab Hasbullah joined discussions on the caliphate’s future, demonstrating that the spiritual and political bond between Java and Istanbul had endured even through centuries of colonial separation.
Today, as Indonesia and Türkiye renew their diplomatic and cultural partnerships, remembering these forgotten chapters is more than an academic exercise. It reminds both nations that their connection is not newly forged; it is revived. The exchange of letters, banners, scholars and ideals between Java and the Ottoman court tells a story of mutual recognition and shared destiny, shaped by faith and fortified by struggle.
In a time when history is often reduced to borders, this story reminds us of something far greater: That centuries ago, the oceans between Java and Istanbul were not distances to be crossed but pathways of solidarity. And perhaps, by revisiting these ties, both nations can rediscover a spirit of cooperation rooted not in nostalgia, but in a shared understanding of what it once meant to belong to a world without walls.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance, values or position of Daily Sabah. The newspaper provides space for diverse perspectives as part of its commitment to open and informed public discussion.