Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy
Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy

Putin. Stock photo: Getty Images
Having analysed the collected data and statements from public Russian figures, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has emphasised that it has continued to believe that “any ceasefire would benefit Russia”.
Source: ISW
Details: ISW noted that Russian demands for Ukrainian “neutrality” and a moratorium on NATO expansion have always been and remain one of the main justifications for Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and any hypothetical concession to these demands would signify Putin’s serious strategic and rhetorical retreat, which he is unlikely to be considering now.
Advertisement:
Russian calls for Ukrainian “neutrality” entail demands for Ukraine to amend its Constitution to remove commitments to obtaining NATO membership and obligations not to join NATO or the European Union (EU).
Analysts, using the gathered data, emphasised that demands for such a “neutral status” have been the goal of Putin’s decade-long efforts aimed at pressuring changes within NATO that would weaken the Alliance to the point that it would be unable to deter or defeat future Russian aggression in Eastern Europe.
Moreover, ISW indicated that Putin is unlikely to make concessions as he will not cease pursuing his goal of controlling Ukraine and weakening NATO unless decisively defeated.
The analysed sources indicated that Russian public figures might simulate interest in concessions regarding Ukraine’s position in Western institutions, attempting to prompt the West into preemptive actions regarding Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
Reports about Putin’s openness to negotiations through informal channels do not mention Russia’s readiness to relinquish any occupied Ukrainian territory.
Russian officials continue to show that Putin’s maximalist goals do not exclude the Russian annexation of the occupied Ukrainian territories or additional territorial gains in Ukraine.
ISW added that Ukraine’s accession to the EU and NATO is a prolonged process that will not be possible immediately after any ceasefire is achieved through negotiations. Russia may temporarily pretend to agree with these demands to strengthen control over the occupied territories quickly.
ISW pointed out that they continue to believe that any ceasefire will benefit Russia, giving it time to recover and regroup for future offensives with the same maximalist goals and further territorial conquests in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, experts added that “there is no reason to assess that Putin would not renege on any commitment to permit Ukraine to integrate into Western political, economic, and military institutions as long as the Russian military can pursue his objectives to prevent Ukraine from doing so”.
ISW also pointed out that Putin has violated Russia’s previous commitments not to infringe upon Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Crimea, made in 1991 and 1994.
To quote the ISW’s Key Takeaways for 26 January:
Support UP or become our patron!