Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy
Faced with a wave of disinformation on social networks concerning the AADL 3 program, the National Agency for the improvement and development of housing increases. Accusing some Internet users of disseminating false information, she announces legal proceedings to defend her credibility and recall the importance of official channels. This was indicated by a press release from the agency.
The agency warned on Monday evening against the spread of false information, targeting in particular certain activists and holders of Facebook Facebook accounts, which it accuses of broadcasting “false” content about the AADL 3 program.
“The AADL agency fully reserves the right to initiate legal proceedings against a group of activists and fake Facebook accounts for having disseminated false information on social networks,” she said.
This reaction comes as a result of the publication of the highly anticipated AADL 3 program results, which aroused lively online controversy, especially among the offsets failed. The cause? A viral video saying that the merchants’ files had been massively rejected. An assertion that the agency categorically described as “fake news”.
As a reminder, the AADL had already denounced this content as being “baseless”, claiming that no targeted exclusion has been made. She also specified that more than 870,000 subscribers have already been able to consult their results via the dedicated electronic platform, proof, according to her, of the regularity and transparency of the process. “This online mobilization is perceived as a deliberate campaign of disinformation aimed at sowing confusion to the public,” denounced the agency.
It should be noted that the number of registrations has crossed 1.4 million, while more than 900,000 subscribers meeting the criteria have been recorded since the end of May.
Concerned about its image, the AADL wanted to recall that the results are available online and that any subscriber who has suffered a refusal can introduce an appeal exclusively via the electronic platform, without having to move physically. This approach, let us recall, is part of a clear desire to “modernize and fluidify administrative procedures”, while avoiding congestion and fraud.
In the same wake, AADL has focused on the importance for citizens to refer only to official channels, including the agency’s website (www.aadl.com.dz), for any information concerning its programs.