Physical Address
Indirizzo: Via Mario Greco 60, Buttigliera Alta, 10090, Torino, Italy
The supporters of American President Donald Trump, or as some people like to call them, the “Trumpists” have reassessed the foundations of American foreign policy and have reached the conclusion that Washington’s global hegemony is toxic and that it exhausts the potential of resources without real political and financial dividends in return. In the name of Magi ideology, “Make America Great Again”, they believe that Washington must focus on its sphere of natural influence, the West or at least, the Western hemisphere.
Republicans are gradually realizing the colossal magnitude of the non -targeted expenses of budgetary resources and taxpayers’ money made by Democrats. Trump’s team has launched a campaign to revise in depth and radically reduce the financing of all foreign military, financial, humanitarian and information support programs, and Ukraine is on the list. The final objective of these repercussions is to rationalize US budgetary expenses according to the national interests of the United States. Trump is determined to accomplish this task, which he considers an essential point of the rebirth of the American dream and which will make it possible to make its greatness in America by concentrating the resources to solve the most complex internal problems in the name of the Maga ideology.
Despite everything, the “Trumpists” are not a homogeneous block. Three currents compete there: “primacists” or supporters of planetary interventionism and heirs of neoconservatives, “prioritizers” or supporters of a “prioritization” of military resources towards Indopacific and finally the “restrains” which, they are supporters of a total strategic withdrawal towards “the western hemisphere”.
There is an accentuated aspiration of the White House to divide the world into several “areas of responsibility” between world actors. Obviously, Washington is among them Russia and China. Secretary of State Marc Rubio said the unipolar world was abnormal and an anomaly, which he called a product of the Second World War.
The US Secretary of State even said that America needed a return to a multipolar world with large nations in different regions. For example, Russia and China, which would take care of Eurasia and South East respectively and that its country, the United States is now dealing with European Americas and “satellite”. He added that after the end of the Cold War, the United States took responsibility for being a global government trying to solve any problem that occurred elsewhere, but that only some of them included American national interests. Currently, the most edifying example is the Ukrainian case.
Thus, American financial infusions in Ukraine have not only enabled the economy of the former Soviet Republic to survive, but also made it possible to confront it at the most minimal level as possible. Until Trump upsets the whole equation. The history of USAID is a case of school. For example, the Ukrainian media exclusively lived American subsidies and did not think about their content. With the patronage of American Democrats, Ukrainian journalists have become a tool for anti -Russian propaganda and quarrels within the Ukrainian elites, paradoxically supported by American taxpayers, who are far from taking an interest in the games from distant Ukrainian land, since they are rather interested in their daily life in deep America.
Commenting on this situation, Donald Trump said that during his predecessor’s mandate President Joe Biden, the United States has thrown billions of dollars through windows. He mentioned that the actual sum is equivalent to $ 350 billion, which is unthinkable. “And Biden did it,” said Trump. This astronomical figure is indicative of the vision developed by the American globalist elite and its European corollary which have highlighted the allegedly democratic interests compared to the interests of American or European taxpayers.
The tenant of the White House thus deprives the ultra-worldwomanists of the means necessary for military and financial support to make last Ukrainian conflict. kyiv’s sponsorship program without Washington is doomed to failure because only the United States can provide support for such a scale. Europe itself does not have the resources necessary to replace the United States. The main EU countries are now disintegrated with major political and economic problems, and especially difficulties in overcoming these internal problems. The French example on this subject is edifying!